Vikram is two years old, and his father travels often. Vikram looks forward to his father's return, when they typically play together and then talk over snacks. Psychologists would refer Vikram's attachment as:

Vikram is two years old, and his father travels often. Vikram looks forward to his father's return, when they typically play together and then talk over snacks. Psychologists would refer Vikram's attachment as:

• A. Secure
• B. Avoidant
• C. Ambivalent
• D. Disorganized

Answer: (B)

Understanding attachment styles means looking at how a toddler responds to a caregiver’s presence and absence. If a child looks forward to a parent’s return and then enjoys activities together, using the parent as a secure base for exploration, that pattern fits secure attachment. In this vignette, Vikram eagerly anticipates his father’s return and, once together, they play and chat over snacks. That warmth, comfort with the caregiver, and smooth transition into shared activities show the child feels safe and supported, which is the hallmark of secure attachment. The other patterns don’t fit as well. An avoidant pattern would involve not seeking closeness or comfort upon reunion, which isn’t described here. An ambivalent (anxious-resistant) pattern would show high distress at separation and mixed signals at reunion, with clinginess and resistance. A disorganized pattern would show inconsistent, unpredictable, or fearful behavior toward the caregiver. So, secure attachment is the best fit for Vikram’s described behavior.

Understanding attachment styles means looking at how a toddler responds to a caregiver’s presence and absence. If a child looks forward to a parent’s return and then enjoys activities together, using the parent as a secure base for exploration, that pattern fits secure attachment. In this vignette, Vikram eagerly anticipates his father’s return and, once together, they play and chat over snacks. That warmth, comfort with the caregiver, and smooth transition into shared activities show the child feels safe and supported, which is the hallmark of secure attachment.

The other patterns don’t fit as well. An avoidant pattern would involve not seeking closeness or comfort upon reunion, which isn’t described here. An ambivalent (anxious-resistant) pattern would show high distress at separation and mixed signals at reunion, with clinginess and resistance. A disorganized pattern would show inconsistent, unpredictable, or fearful behavior toward the caregiver. So, secure attachment is the best fit for Vikram’s described behavior.